Uncommon Wisdom Daily
  • Home
  • Press
  • RSS
  • Login
  • Weiss Ratings
Text Size: smallmediumlarge
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Blog
  • Experts
  • Resources
  • Media
  • Services

General

Share Email Print

Would You Pay President Barack Obama a $3.3 Million Salary?

Tony Sagami | July 10, 2012

If you ask me, all our politicians on a federal level are overcompensated. Every darn one of them!

Not just the elected politicians themselves, but also their armies of support staff on the payroll.

Last week, the White House submitted to Congress a list of its staff members and their salaries. And it is amazing just how many millions of our tax dollars pay not just for President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, but for all their support staff.

Overall, the White House payroll is getting bigger by the year, expanding from $37.1 million in 2010 to $37.8 million in 2011. The number of employees also grew, from 454 last year to 468 in 2012.

A huge chunk of those 468 employees are assistants to the President. The White House reported that Obama has 68 special assistants, 22 assistants and 24 deputy assistants.

I’m not sure what the difference is between a special assistant, a deputy assistant and a regular assistant, but that is a whole lot of assistants by any measure.

Some of those “assistants” are paid pretty darn well. White House Chief of Staff Jacob “Jack” Lew, and national security adviser Thomas Donilon are paid $172,200 a year.

What Salary Would You Expect World Leaders to Earn?

President Obama himself is paid $400,000 a year, which isn’t out of line with what the leaders of other major economies are paid (in U.S. dollars).

United Kingdom: $279,000
Australia: $229,000
Hong Kong: $516,000
Japan: $359,000
Canada: $296,400
Germany: $303,000
France: $302,435

Those salaries look pretty generous compared to India, a nation of 1.2 billion people, which pays its president $36,200 a year.

Generous or not, the real issue isn’t so much the size of those salaries, but how little in terms of economic results that taxpayers get for their money.

Would You Pay President Obama $3.3 Million?

If you compare the United States to Singapore — a model example of free enterprise, capitalism, economic growth and perhaps the purest capitalistic society in the world — we are definitely not getting our money’s worth.

The Singapore president’s salary, also known as the Privy Purse, was US$2.8 million in 2010, $3.3 million in 2011 and $1.7 million in 2012.

Sounds like a lot of money, doesn’t it? Of course, with a paycheck that is quite different from most of the rest of the world, that means the pay structure is also quite different. Here’s how …

The key, I believe, is that all of Singapore Cabinet members (equivalent to our Congress) are eligible for a “National Bonus” if targets are met on economic growth, employment and incomes.

For example, a Singapore politician could earn a bonus equal to eight months of salary if Singapore GDP increases by more than 10%. That bonus dwindles down to nothing if GDP growth falls below 2%.

That begs the question …

Advertisement

Have Singaporeans Gotten Their Money’s Worth from Their Politicians?

To be fair, let’s go back 10 years so that we include the results of both the Obama and Bush administrations. Over the last 10 years, the U.S. GDP has grown by 43%.

Over the same period, Singapore’s GDP has increased by 197%, or 4.5 times faster than the United States.

Yup, I’d say that the Singapore politicians have done a heck of a better job than ours.

  • The 2011 World Bank Ease of Doing Business Index ranks Singapore as the best country in the world to do business.
  • Singapore is also the only Asian country to have AAA credit ratings from all three major credit rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch.
  • The country has a population of roughly 5 million people and has an enviable unemployment rate of 2.2%.
  • Singapore has the third-highest GDP per person in the world, behind only Qatar and Luxembourg.
  • Singapore is the 14th-largest exporter in the world and is home to the busiest shipping port in the world. Today, over 60,000 ships pass through the Strait of Malacca. That equals about 160 ships every day, and they carry about one-quarter of the world’s traded goods.
  • Although there isn’t a drop of oil to be found anywhere in Singapore, it is the 18th-largest oil exporter in the world. How? Singapore imports oil from other countries and further refines it to sell to other countries. Singapore has the third-largest oil refinery in the world, behind Rotterdam and Houston.
  • The government has mandated that English be the primary language used at all levels of the school systems, giving it a highly educated workforce that speaks the international language of commerce.

Singapore is simply one of the best places in the world to invest your money.

If you wanted to put some Singapore into your portfolio, the easiest way is with ETFs. There are three to choose from:

  • iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS)
  • iShares MSCI Singapore Small Cap ETF (EWSS)
  • The Singapore Fund (SGF)

I do believe that you can do much better with a carefully selected basket of Singapore’s best companies, but ETFs are a great way to dip your toes into the Singapore stock market.

I’m not suggesting that you rush out and buy any of these ETFs tomorrow morning. As always, timing is everything so I suggest you wait for my buy signal in Asia Stock Alert.

Singapore, however, is a vibrant, dynamic and growing country that should be on your investment radar screen.

Best wishes,

Tony

P.S. The upcoming U.S. elections are already starting to take center stage in the press. And whoever wins in November has a big job ahead in trying to fix our country.

The global economy is having problems, too, and you’ll need every tool you can get your hands on to protect your wealth. But you don’t have to go it alone over the next few months.

My friend and colleague Larry Edelson’s Real Wealth Report gives you in-depth global analysis and recommendations to protect and grow the very core of your wealth. To join, click here now.

Tony Sagami is the editor of The Asian Century, a trading service designed to help investors profit from the seemingly unstoppable Asian consumption machine. He helps his subscribers tap into this potential through a variety of easy-to-execute strategies on global companies that trade on the U.S. exchanges that also do big business in Asia. For more information on The Asian Century, click here.

Tony is also the editor of International ETF Trader, where he shows members how to make money from trends taking place all over the world in areas like natural resources, gold, oil, commodities, tech, consumer goods and even in individual countries themselves.

Share Email
Tweet

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

Russell Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 11:06 am

Hey Tony, you might want to check your facts mate! The Aussie PM is paid double what the US President is paid, currently A$495,043 which is about US$504,000.

Best regards,

Russell in Sydney

Reply

Dawn Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 12:13 pm

Hi Russell, she she end up accepting her raise? Julia Gillard was approved for her second raise in almost as many months but there might be a chance she turns it down.

Reply

jrj90620 Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 11:31 am

I wouldn’t mind if Obama were paid $10 million a year,if he were a free enterprise president,with wisdom and common sense.Unfortunately,he is the opposite and needs to be paying us $millions to make up for the harm he is doing to this country.

Reply

Russell Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 12:06 pm

Hi Tony, I should read more carefully, the Aussie PM’s salary is not double of your US President but still a good 100Gs more.

Best regards,

Russell in Sydney

Reply

Clare Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 1:19 pm

For the case of Singapore, a comparison with the Prime Minister’s salary is more accurate as he is the one running the country with the cabinet ministers. You can look up PM Lee’s info in this wiki entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Hsien_Loong#Salary.

The President of Singapore plays a largely ceremonial role – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Singapore

Reply

Sharky Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 1:40 pm

According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, federal workers earn TWICE what their private sector counterparts make after you consider their benefits.

More info: http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/income/2010-08-10-1Afedpay10_ST_N.htm

Reply

Sharky Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 1:43 pm

I would happily pay our politicians more if their pay was tied to the unemployment rate and inflation rate.

Reply

Steve Pomfret Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 3:37 pm

Tony How much do you make?
You have to take a look at Obama’s pay in relation to the leaders of large corporations such as Bank of America, General Electric, IBM, Apple, Hewlett Packard and others that have a huge effect on the Global Economy. Obama has shown his ability to get the United States out of expensive Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan so we can get our soldiers back to working on the GDP of this country. Obama has shown his leadership in getting the United States Automobile Industry back on a track of profitability and providing jobs building cars. Comparing Obama to the leaders of countries where workers are forced to work for slave wages is not an apple to apple comparison.

Reply

Mike Hammer Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 11:24 am

Steve, when you can work for 4 years and get a generous pension for life along with free health care for life and secret service protection, I think they are way over-compensated. How many industry execs get that?

Reply

Jack Sunday, July 22, 2012 at 5:14 am

come on .. we are talking about the highest and most difficult to get job in the country. There is misery and glory all wrapped up in one job. They deserve their pay and benefits even though they don’t need it since after they leave speaking engagements give them millions a year.

Reply

Robert Smith Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 9:06 am

Steve….sorry, but the Socialistic policies of Obama and his Liberal/Progressive buddies in both Parties are the very reason we have slipped economically since the sixties and I’ll even venture that it has held us back since the beginning of the last century in a big way! Allowing the Auto Companies to go thru bankruptcy would have been the better route than bailing them out! I really don’t care what the President makes as long as his policies allow capitalistic free enterprise to flourish! Getting rid of regulations are the key to that! You Liberals/Progressives have placed so many regulations on business over the past 100+ years that it is suffucating! The reason Indonesia is doing so well is because it is beating us at the free enterprise capitalism game right now! Wake up, Steve!

Reply

Independent Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 10:37 am

Tony:
We subscribe to the site for investment analysis. We do not need political propaganda and your biases to current administration. Did past Presidents make significantly less salary than current one.
Please provide us brief and to the point advise on what to buy and what to avoid.
This newsletter could have been short and sweet describing why you reccomend to buy Singapore funds.

Reply

larry inscore Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 11:10 am

An insipid theme since political leaders reap wealth from their status that dwarfs their pay.

Reply

Robert Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 9:21 pm

Steve Pomfret
Tony and the Leaders of the large corp you mentioned add value to the economy add are paid accordingly. The President and politicans take value from the economy and if they were paid accordingly to their efforts they would probably need public assistance. Oh, that right, they are already collecting taxpayer assistance.
Leaders are graded on many atributes, one very vital one beinging Moral Courage. If the President has this atribute he has hidden it very well.

Reply

Alex Sunday, July 15, 2012 at 12:43 am

Singapore also has the most efficient and highest quality health care system in the world. The USA spends 14% of GDP on healthcare and Singapore is closer to 7%. They controls all costs by having near real-time reporting and tracking. Unlike the USA which is drowning in fraud and run by the malpractice trial attorneys.

Reply

Kenny Vu Sunday, July 15, 2012 at 2:05 pm

Look at Greece, Spain, Italy, Ireland, Europe and compare. Contrast the rate of inflation and economic growth in the US. We are living in interconnected global economy, and problems elsewhere is going to affect us. Obama is not God, and it is not easy or quick to fix the disastrous invasion of Iraq by Bush and Cheney, or to fix decades of bad policies such as tax subsidies for agriculture that resulted in industrial food production by huge companies, and making profits in the capitalist system by moving jobs overseas to take advantage of low labor cost, out of date tax codes etc. Obama is trying to steer the US in the right direction, with encouragement to use alternative energy, investment in hi tech, encentives to move job back to the US etc., but with confrontational Congress that gives in to small minorities in its party to advance its own extrem policies, blaming the other side etc., and many more expecting the President and government to do everything for them, while sitting on their butts watching worthless commercial/entertainment 24/7 TV programs, eating junk food, and ruining their own health, it does not make sense to blame Obama for not being able to turn things around in a few years. If the 99% of the population voting for cutting tax for the 1% who already paid less tax than the 99% due to loop holes in the tx codes, and thinking that this will stimulate the economy, then the country deserves what it will get.

Reply

Jack Sunday, July 22, 2012 at 5:15 am

I agree with you about all the different type of assistants but come on.. comparing salaries of the US and India – that is ridiculous. And talking about White House Chief of Staff Jacob “Jack” Lew, and national security adviser Thomas Donilon are paid $172,200 a year – these guys have very important jobs and think what they would make in the private sector. The government had to raise pay to compete with the private sector. Now just to be clear I don’t work for the government in any way and I agree it sounds like to many staff, but I would rather see my tax dollars spent there then on bombs and the military complex!

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

I agree to the Terms and Conditions of this Website.

Previous post: Europe fixed?

Next post: Iron Ore Prices Defy Gravity; How to Profit as They Return to Earth

  • Sign Up for FREE Updates

    Enter your name and email to receive free Uncommon Wisdom updates delivered directly to your inbox.We respect your privacy

  • Advertising

  • Market Update

    Click an index for a graph of its recent activity:

    U.S.

    Fri 5/17/13, 5:15pm
    Index Last Change
    DOW
    NASDAQ 3,499 +33.7
    NASDAQ
    S&P 500 1,651 -4.8
    S&P 500

    Europe

    Fri 5/24/13, 5:58am
    Index Last Change
    FTSE 100 6,652 -44.4
    FTSE 100
    CAC 40 3,969 +1.9
    CAC 40
    DAX 8,296 -55.7
    DAX

    Asia

    Fri 5/24/13, 2:28am
    Index Last Change
    HANG SENG 22,619 -51.0
    HANG SENG
    NIKKEI 225 14,612 +128.5
    NIKKEI 225
    CSI 300 Index 2,597 +14.4
    CSI 300
  • Advertising

  • News

    Volatile Nikkei keeps Asian stocks on edge May 24, 2013
    Procter & Gamble brings back former CEO to fix company May 24, 2013
    Google faces new federal antitrust probe: source May 24, 2013
    Market turbulence poses first serious test for Abenomics May 24, 2013
    Icahn seeks up to $7 billion for Dell bid May 24, 2013
    UPDATE 2-German outlook brightens as businesses become more upbeat - Reuters May 24, 2013
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Whitelist Information
  • Advertising
©2013 Uncommon Wisdom Daily. All Rights Reserved.
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]