Uncommon Wisdom Daily
  • Home
  • Press
  • RSS
  • Login
  • Weiss Ratings
Text Size: smallmediumlarge
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Blog
  • Experts
  • Resources
  • Media
  • Services

General

Share Email Print

The Issue That Could Decide the 2012 Election

Tony Sagami | October 30, 2012

The presidential debates were supposed to provide clarity and direction for undecided voters. But the mainstream media tells us that the outcome is cloudier than ever.

From my vantage point, a Mitt Romney victory looks almost assured. And if you look at some research done by a pair of political-science professors from the University of Colorado, you’ll see why I expect a change in administration for the next four years.

In just a moment, we’ll look at one of the biggest opportunities a Romney win could open up for both investors and job seekers. I’ll also share with you how to get access to my specific stock picks in this and other sectors that stand to benefit from a possible change in our country’s leadership.

But first, let’s look at …

The Issue That Could Decide the 2012 Election

Ken Bickers and Michael Berry have developed an intriguing and historically accurate forecasting model that has successfully predicted the winner of every presidential election since 1980.

The root of their methodology is that Americans vote based on their pocketbook. And these decisions are rooted in the economics of each individual state, such as state unemployment rates and real per-capita income.

In other words, like James Carville said, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

And the economy could be the issue that will decide the election.

Could We Really Be Better Off Under Romney?

According to these two political-science experts, Romney will receive 330 of the total 538 Electoral College votes and President Barack Obama will capture 208 votes.

This model isn’t perfect. It has a historical error rate of five states and 28 Electoral College votes per presidential election. But it is the most-accurate forecasting measure I’ve seen.

Assuming that Bickers, Berry and I are right, there are going to be some immediate and profound changes to our economy and the way you should invest your money.

In the previous weeks, I’ve focused on tax and regulatory issues that could be beneficial for investors under the Romney plan. But this week, I want to focus on how the energy landscape will change and how it is going to make some of you very, very rich.

The price of gasoline has more than doubled since President Obama took office. One reason is that the Obama administration appears to have made it difficult and expensive to pull oil out of the ground or ocean.

Offshore permits dropped by an industry-killing 68%. This was after issuing ZERO offshore drilling permits since the BP disaster.

According to the Bureau of Land Management, approximately 3,500 leases were issued in 2007 for energy development on federal property. That number was 37% lower in fiscal year 2011, when only about 2,200 leases were issued for the same purpose.

Romney vowed to encourage more drilling by streamlining and improving the permitting process, opening up new areas and boosting overall drilling activity.

He said he will do that by giving states more power to regulate exploration and production on their own border and on federal lands inside their borders.

Romney also said he will limit the power of the Environmental Protection Agency to restrict production and look for a big push to open up access to previously prohibited areas.

Gasoline Prices Soar,
Nat-Gas Prices Plummet

Gasoline prices have soared, but the price of natural gas has plunged from a peak of $13.58 per million British Thermal Units in July 2008 to less than $4 today.

The reason for the dramatic price drop is that improvement in hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) and horizontal drilling technologies are powering a new energy revolution.

Natural gas production is at 6.5 million barrels per day, a 15-year high. And the Department of Energy forecasts that, next year, U.S. crude and natural gas production will average 11.4 million barrels per day.

Looking forward, Citibank forecasts U.S. production will reach 13 million to 15 million barrels per day by 2020.

To put those numbers in perspective, Saudi Arabia produces around 11.6 million barrels.

As a result, we’ve slashed our dependence upon foreign oil from a whopping 60% in 2005 to 49% today.

In fact, if the politicians and environmental crowd don’t get in the way, the U.S. will be able to tap into our vast natural gas and oil reserves. This could lead to energy independence, for a long time to come.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, we have 1.8 trillion barrels of shale oil/gas, which is enough natural gas to serve all the energy needs of the United States for at least the next 100 years.

Free-Market, Not Government, Stimulus

The unemployment rate, while improving, is still horrible. Twelve million Americans are out of work and another 9 million are under-employed.

The boost in oil and natural gas production on private lands is largely responsible for boosting U.S. oil production by 25% since 2008 and has created 1.7 million new jobs as a result.

Those new jobs, according to Energy Research firm IHS, would pay an average of $35 an hour.

Those are the kinds of jobs our country needs — not the minimum-wage service jobs Obama has been creating.

But wait, it gets even better. IHS also forecasts the energy industry will create a total of 2.5 million new jobs by 2015.

And this will make a big dent on state and federal deficits. I’ve seen forecasts for this new energy revolution to add $62 billion to federal and state revenues in this year alone.

China Has Cheap Labor
U.S. Will Have Cheap Energy

It is hard to quantify the impact that lower natural gas prices and abundant supplies will have on economy. But it is clear that cheap energy will have a huge impact.

That’s because a lot of companies that have previously left the U.S. are coming back because of our cheap energy.

Cheap natural gas prices are now making the U.S. into one of the most-profitable places in the world to make chemicals and fertilizer — two industries that use lots of natural gas.

Additionally, energy-intensive industries like aluminum, steel and glass are enjoying a dramatic drop in production costs.

Natural gas is so cheap that some of my Asian business contacts are now complaining that the U.S. is using cheap energy prices to steal their jobs.

Imagine that. We’ve been complaining for years about cheap Chinese labor. But cheap natural gas prices may offset that wage advantage and rejuvenate our economy.

A Romney presidency could create millions of high-paying energy jobs and lower energy prices for all of us.

As investors, the opportunities are huge. And on Nov. 7, you can be among the first to gain instant access to a dozen stocks tailored specifically to the election’s outcome … a dozen potential presidential profit-doublers, that is!

That’s because I’ve compiled a short list of companies, including my top two energy picks, whose profits (and stock prices) can potentially skyrocket under a Romney presidency. I call them my 12 Romney Windfall Stocks.

Now, if Obama makes his case to the American public to keep his job, you’re covered that way, too. That’s because my colleague Sean Brodrick has 13 Obama Profit Bonanzas ready and waiting for you for a potential second Obama term.

No matter who wins, you will know exactly where to invest your wealth based on who’s in the White House for the next four years

Don’t wait till the elections are over — make November 7 a new beginning for your wealth when you reserve your “Election Day Survival and Prosperity Guide” today!

Best wishes,

Tony

Tony Sagami is the editor of The Asian Century, a trading service designed to help investors profit from the seemingly unstoppable Asian consumption machine. He helps his subscribers tap into this potential through a variety of easy-to-execute strategies on global companies that trade on the U.S. exchanges that also do big business in Asia. For more information on The Asian Century, click here.

Tony is also the editor of International ETF Trader, where he shows members how to make money from trends taking place all over the world in areas like natural resources, gold, oil, commodities, tech, consumer goods and even in individual countries themselves.

Share Email
Tweet

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Terry Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 10:07 am

Tony

You see only the potential profit in everything you look at. You have no cares for environment, fairness of wealth distribution or any benefits of wealth creation, i.e. speculative betting, other than putting more money in your pocket. You tout Romney for his tax cutting and lowering of environmental oversight, just so you and your ilk can make more profit. You care not that fracking causes vast environmental, health and societal issues, you see only the potential profits arising from these damaging methods of gas extraction. But then, why should you care if the environment in the US is degraded for profit when you live overseas for most of the year.

You and your fellow “investors” at Weiss have no morals when it comes to making money. You really are a bunch of sociopaths, with no care about ethical investing. You really are a disgusting lot.

Reply

jrj90620 Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 12:58 pm

Hope you’re right about Romney being elected,but from where I sit,in So California,looks like Obama will be reelected.

Reply

Rob Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 3:58 pm

Tony, if Romney wins he may sell off some more public lands drilling permits but oil companies don’t drill for the fun of it. If oil prospects look, they’ll do it, no matter who is President or else they will sit on the permits. OPEC and large oil companies are the best of pals. They both want oil prices to remain high. From a Canadian perspective, we see those oil lobbying commercials too about “energy” independence by further drilling or tar sands.. There is no talk of reducing oil consumption. Companies like Ford and GM produce wonderful, small, powerful clean diesel engines in Europe. I’ve driven them. Bringing over that technology(along with natural gas engines) alone will remove America’s independence on the Middle East.. No new massive new well drilling. That would reduce oil consumption….oil companies don’t want that…it’s always about more volume oil consumption that’s why they invest in the energy alternatives that sound GREEN. They will never work. Besides Inew drilling in Iraq reveals massive oil finds. Those are the spoils of war. Resources are denominated in printed money, why should oil prices fall allot. Regarding China, match the 25% tariff they have on our manfacturered goods and we have solved the problem. THAT won’t happen because US corporations love it! They get to break all domestic labour laws, code of ethics and just what IS RIGHT! Why, for a short term quick buck! Meanwhile we all need the American consumer to buy products ais insane!d we are starving the consumer…crazy. I was in China this year and visited 4 cities. Lots of empty building and a non capitalist system. They can’t improve wages, US corps will leave. They NEED us, we don’t NEED THEM. The US must restore a level playing field in business. Small and medium size businesses are the ones that innovate and replace the larger corporate comprtitors. But if these large corporations develop a lazy cruch like having slave labour 3,000 miles away, how can domestic business people compete. It weakens American business.

This election is insane. We have never seen Americans so misinformed. America’s large corporations have become lobbying machines trying rig the rules to protect them and such welfare handouts. The insulting thing is when you hear them say Government can’t do anything right and at the same time ask for a handout. Where would Boeing and GM be without taxpayer contract…look at military contracts. Look at the so called Banks…the ultimate welfare handout. Who gets blamed…….average workers….crazy. Got to go…sorry

Reply

rstottle Sunday, November 4, 2012 at 1:21 pm

Virtually every poll aggregation site, (e.g., 538blog, Princeton Election Consortium) has Obama an 80-90% favorite. These two guys are out in right field by themselves. Most important, the other websites are based on actual polling data, not just economic correlations.

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

I agree to the Terms and Conditions of this Website.

Previous post: A Big-Picture View …

Next post: Your Road to Post-Election Profits … and Beyond

  • Sign Up for FREE Updates

    Enter your name and email to receive free Uncommon Wisdom updates delivered directly to your inbox.We respect your privacy

  • Advertising

  • Market Update

    Click an index for a graph of its recent activity:

    U.S.

    Fri 5/17/13, 5:15pm
    Index Last Change
    DOW
    NASDAQ 3,499 +33.7
    NASDAQ
    S&P 500 1,672 +5.3
    S&P 500

    Europe

    Tue 5/21/13, 9:56am
    Index Last Change
    FTSE 100 6,777 +21.1
    FTSE 100
    CAC 40 4,032 +9.1
    CAC 40
    DAX 8,460 +3.9
    DAX

    Asia

    Tue 5/21/13, 2:28am
    Index Last Change
    HANG SENG 23,366 -126.7
    HANG SENG
    NIKKEI 225 15,381 +20.2
    NIKKEI 225
    CSI 300 Index 2,615 +5.2
    CSI 300
  • Advertising

  • News

    Wall Street Starts Higher, Eyes on Fed May 21, 2013
    Gold ETFs Are Liquidating by the Ton May 21, 2013
    Housing Recovery Boosts Home Depot 1Q Results May 21, 2013
    IRS Officials Back on Capitol Hill Hot Seat Over Targeting May 21, 2013
    Best Buy Reports 1Q Loss on Restructuring Cost May 21, 2013
    JPMorgan Averts CEO/Chair Job Split in Early Count - CNBC.com - CNBC.com May 21, 2013
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Whitelist Information
  • Advertising
©2013 Uncommon Wisdom Daily. All Rights Reserved.
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]